![]() ![]() ![]() I have no idea where that comes from, but if you want to get rid of that, we have a tool for that in Gramps. Which is perfect for Gramps, and can be changed to a true place hierarchy later. That is a little weird, because it’s a subordinate of the ADDR, and hence should be ignored, but it is imported anyway.įor me, it’s quite easy to write a little program that replaces the ADDR and CITY lines with a single line, so that the RESI block is changed to 1 RESI That _NAME tag is used to export the name of an object like a palace. Residences are a problem indeed, because Gramps ignores the ADDR tag, and also the _NAME tag that I found in the Oranje demo tree. Witnesses are not supported in standard GEDCOM, so supporting those would mean that we have to write an extension to the GEDCOM importer to deal with them. ![]() You can easily clean up this mess with a text editor. It seems that that GDP mixes up MAP and _MAP, LATI and _LATI, and LONG and _LONG, which is something that I see as an error in GDP. I had another look earlier this week, and need to make a few remarks. And when these developers are sponsored by organisations that live in their own bubbles too, like the NGV, this is what you get.Ĭonverting Pro-Gen files is much easier, because the Pro-Gen datamodel is much simpler, and is more like a subset of the model that we use in Gramps. And because of that, many Dutch users have lived in a bubble, in which they created their own data models, which are quite different from the ones used by American programs, like PAF, RootsMagic, and Gramps. I know many Dutch people who think that Dutch genealogists must use software made in Holland, because only Dutch programmers know about surname prefixes, which is nonsense, because they are supported by GEDCOM, and Gramps. And that type is meaningless for Gramps, just like types (civil) and (religious). In your test file, I found families with MARR events, some of which have TYPE (partners).In Gramps, there is a setting for imported families, that you can set to married, unmarried, and maybe a couple of other values,.And in the mean time, I also found the problem with persons married against their will, which is twofold: ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |